Get me off Your Fucking Mailing List
A historically minimal manuscript presented in a full journal frame.
Subject
Topic landing page for Science communication. Use this route to browse all issue content tagged to this subject.
A historically minimal manuscript presented in a full journal frame.
Interface hierarchy can alter confidence before any paragraph is read.
A playful but formal analysis of cats as complex fluids under confinement.
A deadpan reminder that not every obvious intervention has a randomized trial.
A follow-up BMJ satire that technically runs the trial by choosing very low-risk jumps.
A short BMJ measurement paper that asks a strangely specific anatomical question.
A conference acceptance test built by repeatedly tapping phone autocomplete.
A parody biomedical manuscript with film lore and broken citations still reached acceptance.
Randomly generated text plus cartoon bylines exposed fake peer-review theater.
A flawed fake paper was submitted widely to test open-access review quality.
A fabricated and unqualified scholar profile received editorial invitations.
A formal test of the cultural claim that Reviewer 2 is systematically harsher.
A crowdsourced wall of extreme and often hostile reviewer comments.
A BMJ Christmas study quantifying predatory invitation spam and unsubscribe outcomes.
A parody journal concept where all submissions are rejected by design.
A famously minimal paper whose near-empty content embodies its own diagnosis.
A satirical checklist of mentoring failures that graduate students recognize instantly.
Administrative satire on how to burn trust, morale, and legitimacy in a department.
A black-humor management playbook for metric obsession and bureaucratic overload.
A fabricated biomedical manuscript reportedly accepted by multiple low-quality journals.
A deliberately absurd pandemic-era submission accepted then quickly retracted.
A GPT-4 era stress test of suspected predatory journals using generated manuscripts.
A demonstration of how weak study design and hype channels can manufacture credibility.
A BMJ-era joke case that continued to echo in later scientific references.